CRA calls for arrears curiosity on donation tax shelter purchased by ex

Article content material

Underneath our tax system in Canada, every particular person recordsdata his or her personal tax return and is taxed on the revenue they earn on a person foundation. The United States, then again, permits the submitting of joint tax returns through which each spouses can pool their revenue on the identical return, with increased joint-tax brackets for the couple than for a single taxpayer.

Article content material

Article content material

There are, nonetheless, a couple of locations on the Canadian tax return the place spouses or common-law companions have a possibility for tax planning by selecting on which return to assert sure revenue, bills or credit.

Article content material

Maybe essentially the most well-known alternative for spousal tax planning is the flexibility to separate eligible pension revenue along with your partner. Pension splitting means that you can save revenue tax the place one partner is in a decrease tax bracket upon retirement than the opposite, and may additionally assist you to protect income-tested authorities advantages and credit, resembling your Outdated Age Safety pension or the age credit score. To reap the advantages of pension splitting for 2024, each you and your partner should full Canada Income Company Type T1032, Joint Election to Cut up Pension Earnings and file the varieties along with your tax returns.

One other alternative for tax financial savings between spouses is in terms of claiming medical bills. For the 2024 return, you possibly can declare medical bills in case your family’s complete eligible medical bills exceed the lesser of three per cent of your web revenue, or $2,759. Because of this, it’s usually advisable to pool all of the household’s medical bills collectively and declare them on the lower-income partner’s tax return.

Article content material

Article content material

Lastly, in terms of charitable donations, it’s usually greatest to pool all donations on one partner’s return, as a result of there’s a decrease federal credit score of 15 per cent for the primary $200 of annual charitable donations. (Alberta taxpayers will be the exception owing to Alberta’s excessive provincial donation credit score of 60 per cent on the primary $200.) As well as, for high-income earners (revenue over $246,752 in 2024), the federal donation credit score price jumps to 33 per cent, that means that the high-income partner ought to usually declare donations if they’re the only real partner with revenue over that threshold.

But it surely’s essential to keep in mind that in the event you do select to assert a donation tax credit score in your return, even when the donation was made by your partner, you’re the one who’s in the end accountable ought to the CRA ever problem the validity of your donation. Take the latest case, determined earlier this month, of a taxpayer who went to federal court docket in search of a judicial evaluation of a call by the CRA denying her request for reduction of arrears curiosity accruing since 2005 on a donation tax shelter bought by her now ex-husband.

Article content material

The taxpayer’s troubles started again in 2005, when she claimed a tax credit score in respect of a $41,616 donation to the Canadian Humanitarian Belief (CHT). The donation was organized by her ex, though she claimed it on her personal tax return. The CHT was a donation tax shelter scheme through which 1000’s of Canadians participated. Individuals made a money donation to the CHT, which then generated an in-kind donation that the members claimed on their tax returns. In 2005, the taxpayer’s money donation was $11,340 whereas the in-kind donation represented the distinction between this quantity and the $41,616 claimed on her tax return.

In June 2008, the CRA reassessed the taxpayer’s 2005 tax return, and denied the donation tax credit score in full. She was consequently reassessed for an extra quantity of $18,460 of tax owing, plus arrears curiosity. In December 2008, the taxpayer filed her first discover of objection. In February 2009, the CRA knowledgeable her that given the excessive variety of Canadians who had participated within the CHT tax shelter, her objection could be held in abeyance till a closing judicial choice on the validity of those donations was rendered.

Article content material

Quick ahead to February 2015, when the CRA suggested the taxpayer that her 2005 tax return could be reassessed to permit solely the money portion of the donation, and that the arrears curiosity could be adjusted accordingly. The CRA then supplied the taxpayer with two choices: she may both waive her objection or attraction rights and the CRA would cancel the curiosity for the in-kind portion of her donation, or she may pursue her objection, through which case arrears curiosity would proceed to accrue on her excellent stability. The letter additionally indicated that silence could be interpreted as choosing choice two.

The taxpayer by no means responded to the CRA’s letter, and in July 2015, the taxpayer’s 2005 tax return was reassessed to permit solely the money portion of the donation, along with her excellent tax owing lowered to $13,551, plus arrears curiosity. The taxpayer once more objected, however her objection was held in abeyance pending a closing choice in two lead take a look at circumstances regarding the validity of in-kind donations to the CHT.

Article content material

Lastly, in Could 2020, the Federal Court docket of Attraction in the end dominated that the CHT was, in truth, a donation tax shelter scheme, and disallowed claims for charitable tax credit for in-kind donations. In January 2021, the Supreme Court docket of Canada denied go away to attraction, thus formally ending the authorized journey.

The CRA then resumed processing objections regarding the reassessment of CHT donations and in June 2022 the taxpayer was issued a discover of affirmation that the in-kind donation of $30,318 was disallowed as a charitable donation. The CRA did conform to waive some arrears curiosity for 2020 due to the CRA’s response to the pandemic, and from a part of 2021 by 2022, due to the CRA’s delays in processing objections after the ultimate decision of the 2 take a look at circumstances.

The taxpayer objected and went to tax court docket. In February 2024, that court docket dismissed her attraction, figuring out that the taxpayer “couldn’t shift duty onto her ex-husband, as she claimed the donations on her 2005 tax returns and now she should stay with the implications.”

Article content material

The taxpayer, confronted with a big tax invoice and 20 years’ value of arrears curiosity, wrote to the CRA requesting curiosity reduction. This was twice denied by the CRA, so the taxpayer went to federal court docket in search of a judicial evaluation of the CRA’s choice to not waive curiosity.

Earlier this month, the federal court docket decide dismissed the taxpayer’s case, discovering that the taxpayer “has not met her burden to show the unreasonableness of the (CRA’s) choice to disclaim her taxpayer reduction.”

The case serves as an essential reminder to all of us this tax season: be sure to’re snug with something you declare in your private return.

Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Personal Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.

In the event you favored this story, join extra within the FP Investor publication.

Bookmark our web site and assist our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information it’s worthwhile to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters right here.

Article content material