Present Affairs Quiz 05 July 2025
Present Affairs Quiz 05 July 2025
Data
Present Affairs Quiz 05 July 2025 For UPSC Examination
You might have already accomplished the quiz earlier than. Therefore you cannot begin it once more.
You should register or signal as much as begin the quiz.
You need to end following quiz, to begin this quiz:
-
Query 1 of 5
Close to India’s diaspora coverage and up to date initiatives in Trinidad and Tobago, contemplate the next statements:
1. The Abroad Residents of India (OCI) card now extends as much as sixth-generation descendants of Indian origin in sure international locations.
2. Trinidad and Tobago is the primary Caribbean nation to undertake India’s Unified Funds Interface (UPI) system.
Which of the above statements is/are appropriate?AppropriateAppropriate Reply: (c) Each 1 and a couple of
Rationalization:
• Assertion 1 – Appropriate: PM Modi introduced the extension of OCI playing cards to sixth-generation Indians in Trinidad & Tobago, a historic transfer past the sooner fourth-generation restrict.
• Assertion 2 – Appropriate: Trinidad and Tobago turned the primary Caribbean nation to undertake India’s UPI system, advancing India’s digital public infrastructure diplomacy.IncorrectAppropriate Reply: (c) Each 1 and a couple of
Rationalization:
• Assertion 1 – Appropriate: PM Modi introduced the extension of OCI playing cards to sixth-generation Indians in Trinidad & Tobago, a historic transfer past the sooner fourth-generation restrict.
• Assertion 2 – Appropriate: Trinidad and Tobago turned the primary Caribbean nation to undertake India’s UPI system, advancing India’s digital public infrastructure diplomacy. -
Query 2 of 5
Assertion (A): India issued a proper WTO notification reserving the fitting to impose retaliatory tariffs of $724 million on U.S. items in July 2025.
Cause (R): America imposed safeguard tariffs on Indian vehicles with out conducting prior consultations as mandated below WTO guidelines.
Which of the next is appropriate?AppropriateAppropriate Reply: (a) Each A and R are true, and R is the right rationalization of A
Rationalization:
• Assertion (A) is true: India notified the WTO about its intent to retaliate with tariffs price $723.75 million on U.S. merchandise in response to the U.S. motion.
• Cause (R) can be true: Below the Settlement on Safeguards, the U.S. was obligated to seek the advice of India earlier than imposing the 25% tariff. It failed to take action.
• Since India’s retaliatory motion was instantly because of the U.S. skipping the mandated session, R accurately explains A.IncorrectAppropriate Reply: (a) Each A and R are true, and R is the right rationalization of A
Rationalization:
• Assertion (A) is true: India notified the WTO about its intent to retaliate with tariffs price $723.75 million on U.S. merchandise in response to the U.S. motion.
• Cause (R) can be true: Below the Settlement on Safeguards, the U.S. was obligated to seek the advice of India earlier than imposing the 25% tariff. It failed to take action.
• Since India’s retaliatory motion was instantly because of the U.S. skipping the mandated session, R accurately explains A. -
Query 3 of 5
Close to the resumption of the Kailash Manasarovar Yatra in 2025, contemplate the next statements:
1. The Lipulekh Go route is longer however motorable, whereas the Nathu La route is shorter and requires high-altitude trekking.
2. The yatra is taken into account sacred not solely in Hinduism and Buddhism but in addition in Jainism and the Bon custom.
3. India’s 2019 proposal to checklist the Indian routes of the yatra as UNESCO heritage websites has not but been accepted.
Which of the above statements are appropriate?AppropriateAppropriate Reply: (b) 2 and three solely
Rationalization:
• Assertion 1 – Incorrect: It reverses the routes. The Lipulekh Go (Uttarakhand) is shorter however high-altitude, requiring strenuous trekking. Nathu La (Sikkim) is longer however motorable, making it much less bodily demanding.
• Assertion 2 – Appropriate: The positioning holds religious significance for Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, and followers of the Bon faith.
• Assertion 3 – Appropriate: India utilized for UNESCO World Heritage standing for the Indian yatra routes in 2019, however the software remains to be pending, and the Chinese language facet is unlikely to assist world scrutiny.IncorrectAppropriate Reply: (b) 2 and three solely
Rationalization:
• Assertion 1 – Incorrect: It reverses the routes. The Lipulekh Go (Uttarakhand) is shorter however high-altitude, requiring strenuous trekking. Nathu La (Sikkim) is longer however motorable, making it much less bodily demanding.
• Assertion 2 – Appropriate: The positioning holds religious significance for Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, and followers of the Bon faith.
• Assertion 3 – Appropriate: India utilized for UNESCO World Heritage standing for the Indian yatra routes in 2019, however the software remains to be pending, and the Chinese language facet is unlikely to assist world scrutiny. -
Query 4 of 5
Close to the Dalai Lama succession controversy and India’s diplomatic response, contemplate the next statements:
1. India’s Ministry of Exterior Affairs has explicitly supported the Gaden Phodrang Belief’s authority in appointing the following Dalai Lama.
2. The Golden Urn system, invoked by China, has traditionally been resisted by the Tibetan neighborhood and was utilized inconsistently.
Which of the above statements is/are appropriate?AppropriateAppropriate Reply: (b) 2 solely
Rationalization:
• Assertion 1 – Incorrect: India has maintained strict neutrality and has not endorsed any establishment’s declare, together with the Gaden Phodrang Belief. The MEA acknowledged it doesn’t take positions on spiritual issues.
• Assertion 2 – Appropriate: The Golden Urn system was traditionally resisted by Tibetans and never uniformly adopted, making its legitimacy contested even inside Tibetan Buddhism.IncorrectAppropriate Reply: (b) 2 solely
Rationalization:
• Assertion 1 – Incorrect: India has maintained strict neutrality and has not endorsed any establishment’s declare, together with the Gaden Phodrang Belief. The MEA acknowledged it doesn’t take positions on spiritual issues.
• Assertion 2 – Appropriate: The Golden Urn system was traditionally resisted by Tibetans and never uniformly adopted, making its legitimacy contested even inside Tibetan Buddhism. -
Query 5 of 5
Take into account the next statements concerning the implications of the U.S. 1% remittance tax below the One Huge Stunning Invoice Act (OBBBA):
1. The tax is anticipated to considerably scale back general remittance inflows to India because of the worth sensitivity of the U.S.-based Indian diaspora.
2. The tax applies solely to business remittance transfers above a threshold of $10,000 yearly.
3. India might contemplate elevating issues in regards to the tax on the WTO if it perceives it to be discriminatory.
4. The RBI is anticipated to impose capital controls on incoming remittances to safeguard international alternate reserves post-2026.
How lots of the above statements are appropriate?AppropriateAppropriate Reply: (a) Just one
Rationalization:
• Assertion 1 – Incorrect: The U.S.-based Indian diaspora (primarily professionals and H1B visa holders) is much less price-sensitive in comparison with Gulf-based employees. Therefore, a 1% tax is unlikely to considerably scale back remittances.
• Assertion 2 – Incorrect: The tax applies to non-commercial abroad transfers, not business ones. There’s no point out of a $10,000 threshold.
• Assertion 3 – Appropriate: India might increase issues on the WTO or bilaterally if the tax is seen as discriminatory.
• Assertion 4 – Incorrect: The RBI just isn’t anticipated to impose capital controls; remittances are nonetheless strong and the influence is manageable.IncorrectAppropriate Reply: (a) Just one
Rationalization:
• Assertion 1 – Incorrect: The U.S.-based Indian diaspora (primarily professionals and H1B visa holders) is much less price-sensitive in comparison with Gulf-based employees. Therefore, a 1% tax is unlikely to considerably scale back remittances.
• Assertion 2 – Incorrect: The tax applies to non-commercial abroad transfers, not business ones. There’s no point out of a $10,000 threshold.
• Assertion 3 – Appropriate: India might increase issues on the WTO or bilaterally if the tax is seen as discriminatory.
• Assertion 4 – Incorrect: The RBI just isn’t anticipated to impose capital controls; remittances are nonetheless strong and the influence is manageable.
Leave a Reply